<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Putting your ASP.NET Web Application in Maintenance Mode (using ISAPI_Rewrite)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leekelleher.com/2009/09/29/putting-your-asp-net-web-application-in-maintenance-mode-using-isapi_rewrite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leekelleher.com/2009/09/29/putting-your-asp-net-web-application-in-maintenance-mode-using-isapi_rewrite/</link>
	<description>Umbraco Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 12:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eran</title>
		<link>http://leekelleher.com/2009/09/29/putting-your-asp-net-web-application-in-maintenance-mode-using-isapi_rewrite/comment-page-1/#comment-9047</link>
		<dc:creator>eran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leekelleher.com/?p=177#comment-9047</guid>
		<description>HI lee, accidentally just now saw you replay..
any way, the umbraco package idea is not so good - if the umbraco instance is down for major maintenance, maybe the whole asp.net is not available. if i&#039;m wrong please correct me.
anyway i will stay with the app_offline.htm for now. one thing to keep in mind with this file however, make sure it is larger than 512 bytes or IE will consider it a 404 and will display the 404 instead of the contents of your app_offline.htm file. (or map the 404. 403.1 errors to app_offline.htm)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI lee, accidentally just now saw you replay..<br />
any way, the umbraco package idea is not so good &#8211; if the umbraco instance is down for major maintenance, maybe the whole asp.net is not available. if i&#8217;m wrong please correct me.<br />
anyway i will stay with the app_offline.htm for now. one thing to keep in mind with this file however, make sure it is larger than 512 bytes or IE will consider it a 404 and will display the 404 instead of the contents of your app_offline.htm file. (or map the 404. 403.1 errors to app_offline.htm)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Kelleher</title>
		<link>http://leekelleher.com/2009/09/29/putting-your-asp-net-web-application-in-maintenance-mode-using-isapi_rewrite/comment-page-1/#comment-9046</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Kelleher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 08:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leekelleher.com/?p=177#comment-9046</guid>
		<description>Hi Eran, while it is possible to control a website&#039;s maintenance mode from the Umbraco back-office - its not suitable for upgrading Umbraco itself.

Basically you want to be &#039;outside of ASP.NET&#039; when doing an upgrade, which is why I used ISAPI_Rewrite, but you could easily do this in IIS7 too!

If you are thinking of a more generic &#039;maintenance mode&#039; package for Umbraco - say if you wanted to take your website offline quickly, then - sure it&#039;s achievable!

Drop me an email next week (I&#039;m on holiday this week)
http://leekelleher.com/contact/

Cheers, Lee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Eran, while it is possible to control a website&#8217;s maintenance mode from the Umbraco back-office &#8211; its not suitable for upgrading Umbraco itself.</p>
<p>Basically you want to be &#8216;outside of ASP.NET&#8217; when doing an upgrade, which is why I used ISAPI_Rewrite, but you could easily do this in IIS7 too!</p>
<p>If you are thinking of a more generic &#8216;maintenance mode&#8217; package for Umbraco &#8211; say if you wanted to take your website offline quickly, then &#8211; sure it&#8217;s achievable!</p>
<p>Drop me an email next week (I&#8217;m on holiday this week)<br />
<a href="http://leekelleher.com/contact/" rel="nofollow">http://leekelleher.com/contact/</a></p>
<p>Cheers, Lee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eran</title>
		<link>http://leekelleher.com/2009/09/29/putting-your-asp-net-web-application-in-maintenance-mode-using-isapi_rewrite/comment-page-1/#comment-9045</link>
		<dc:creator>eran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leekelleher.com/?p=177#comment-9045</guid>
		<description>nice tip thanks!
i think it will be great to see an umbraco package that can take care of it and enable the user to turn the site offline with a single checkbox, except specific ip. maybe i can help to develop it, with some guidelines from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice tip thanks!<br />
i think it will be great to see an umbraco package that can take care of it and enable the user to turn the site offline with a single checkbox, except specific ip. maybe i can help to develop it, with some guidelines from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirk De Grave</title>
		<link>http://leekelleher.com/2009/09/29/putting-your-asp-net-web-application-in-maintenance-mode-using-isapi_rewrite/comment-page-1/#comment-9044</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirk De Grave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.leekelleher.com/?p=177#comment-9044</guid>
		<description>Great tip Lee and thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip Lee and thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

